Probabilistic Heavy Snow and Icing Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 343 AM EST Sun Dec 30 2018 Valid 12Z Sun Dec 30 2018 - 12Z Wed Jan 02 2019 ...Northern to Central Rockies Day 1... The models show moist confluent mid level flow with embedded mid level vertical velocity maxima crossing the ranges of western and central MT, central ID, and northeast OR early today, then continuing downstream across northern WY. These vertical velocity maxima occur in conjunction with favorable upper level divergence maxima as the upper trough amplifies as it moves from the northern Rockies, with the upper level circulation near northwest WY by 12z Mon. Several inches of snow are likely in the ranges of these areas, WPC probabilities are high for 4 inches of snow, and low to moderate for 8 inches of snow. ...Southern Rockies and Southwest Days 2/3... ...Heavy Snow possible in the ranges of southern CO, eastern AZ, and NM... An amplifying upper trough building into southwest from the Great Basin drives a jet out of AZ across NM. The heaviest snow is likely once again across the ranges of southern CO and across New Mexico and eastern Arizona. Here, the best combination of jet level diffluence, low-level convergence and moist advection, and upslope enhancement will combine to produce heavy snowfall from the ranges of southern Colorado through much of New Mexico and eastern Arizona. The heaviest snowfall is likely in the southern Sangre De Cristos, as well as the mountains in western New Mexico/SE Arizona, where the most persistent 300 mb jet core is likely, with associated upper divergence maxima combining with upslope flow to produce snow. The higher WPC probabilities shift south from southern CO (San Juans and Sangre de Cristo mountains) and northern NM/eastern AZ day 2 to southern Arizona/central and southern NM on day 3 (Tue). Timing of the upper trough leads to QPF differences and resultant snow amounts differences, with the UKMET standing out as slower than other models and keeping the precip/snow axis further west in AZ. ...Central and Northern Plains/Upper Mississippi Valley Day 1... A northern stream shortwave will eject eastward across the Northern Plains, preceded by a swath of light to moderate snow where the best upper divergence, height falls, and low level convergence along a low level frontogenetic zone combine. Due to limited moisture, total snow accumulations are likely to be modest across the Dakotas and Minnesota. A low risk for 4 inches is indicated in the probabilities. ....Great Lakes and Interior New York/England...Day 2 into early Day 3... A southern stream shortwave will move northeast, with a surface wave progressing across the eastern Great Lakes and into New York and New England Monday night-Tuesday morning. Robust ascent due to warm advection and lift beneath a jet maximum will produce widespread precipitation. Low-mid level deformation and frontogenesis aid on producing lift where it is cold enough for snow across parts of WI and MI and then downstream into northern New York and northern New England. A maximum is expected in southern ME, where a low level frontogenesis and convergence maxima occurs along the path of the wave. Further south, precip type uncertainty in northern IL, southern lower MI and southern New York/southern New England leads to rapidly dropping probabilities for snow. There remains considerable spread in the guidance into how much phasing of the northern and southern streams will occur, with the ECMWF/NAM producing more snow in WI/MI than much of the other guidance.The 00z NAM Conus Nest shows less snow in WI than the parent NAM. The northern stream wave produces day 2 snow from eastern MN across northern WI and the UP of MI as the synoptic lift is followed by lake enhancements in the proximity of Lake Superior. On Tue morning, the triple point low develops near the ME coast and moves offshore, leading to the snow and mixed precip in Maine ending as the peak ascent moves off the coast with the low pressure center. The probability for significant freezing rain (0.25 inches or more) is less than 10 percent. Petersen