Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo - Click to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service   NWS logo - Click to go to the NWS homepage
The Weather Prediction Center

 
 

 

Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Facebook Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Twitter
NCEP Quarterly Newsletter
WPC Home
Analyses and Forecasts
   National High & Low
   WPC Discussions
   Surface Analysis
   Days ½-2½ CONUS
   Days 3-7 CONUS
   Days 4-8 Alaska
   QPF
   PQPF
   Flood Outlook
   Winter Weather
   Storm Summaries
   Heat Index
   Tropical Products
   Daily Weather Map
   GIS Products
Current Watches/
Warnings

Satellite and Radar Imagery
  GOES-East Satellite
  GOES-West Satellite
  National Radar
Product Archive
WPC Verification
   QPF
   Medium Range
   Model Diagnostics
   Event Reviews
   Winter Weather
International Desks
Development and Training
   Development
WPC Overview
   About the WPC
   Staff
   WPC History
   Accomplishments
   Other Sites
   FAQs
Meteorological Calculators
Contact Us
   About Our Site
 
USA.gov is the U.S. Government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services.
 
Model Diagnostics Discussion
 
(Latest Discussion - Issued 0631Z Aug 17, 2018)
 
Version Selection
Versions back from latest:  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   
 
Abbreviations and acronyms used in this product
 
Geographic Boundaries -  Map 1: Color  Black/White       Map 2: Color  Black/White


Model Diagnostic Discussion
NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD
231 AM EDT Fri Aug 17 2018

Valid Aug 17/0000 UTC thru Aug 20/1200 UTC

...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air
ingest...

00Z Model Evaluation...with Preferences and Confidence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...Overall Synoptic Pattern across the CONUS...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Preference: Blend of 00Z ECMWF, 00Z CMC, 00Z GFS
Confidence: Average

---06Z UPDATE---
No change to the preliminary preferences or reasoning. The 00Z
UKMET, CMC and ECMWF were fairly consistent with their prior runs.
The UKMET did trend slightly toward the consensus.

---PREVIOUS DISCUSSION---
Over the next few days, the ECMWF, CMC and GFS offer decent
agreement and all three deterministic models are contained well
within the ensemble spread envelope for their various mass fields.
Greater differences begin to emerge just beyond the time period
that is the scope of this discussion, into next week, as a surface
low begins to take shape in the Midwest. Nevertheless, in this
time period, they are close enough that a blend of the three is
preferred. The 00Z NAM shows a notably faster progression and
digging with the trough pushing into the West Coast on Sunday. It
is also out of phase with the Northeast trough as compared to the
other models. The 12Z UKMET shows better alignment with the
troughs and ridges, but its heights are notably higher east of the
Rockies by Sunday, and occasionally near the outer extent of the
ensemble spread envelope. Therefore, the NAM and UKMET were
excluded for these reasons.


Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml
500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml

Lamers