Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1255 AM EDT Sat Apr 28 2018 Valid Apr 28/0000 UTC thru May 01/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z NAM/GFS evaluation...with preliminary preferences ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Evolving eastern CONUS trough/closed low, with phasing and consolidation of several shortwaves over the Great Lakes and Northeast through Sunday... ...Surface low near the New England/Canadian border today/Sunday... ...Offshore surface low near Nova Scotia Sunday morning... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: General model blend Confidence: Slightly above average Convergence in model cycles has occurred since yesterday such that now, the models show similarly with only minor strength/placement differences remaining with features impacting the sensible weather across the Northeast. Given rather tight ensemble clustering, a general model blend is recommended to smooth out smaller scale differences. ...Closed low over the Pacific Northwest today, opening into a trough over the Intermountain West by Monday... ...Lee cyclogenesis over the Plains by Monday with attendant cold front... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Blend of the 00Z GFS and 12Z ECMWF Confidence: Slightly below average The 00Z NAM/GFS are slightly quicker with the leading edge of the mid-level trough axis nearing the northern Plains Sunday evening but the complexity of the individual vorticity maxima within the trough opening up proves challenging. Ensemble scatter low plots emphasize a "southern" surface low over North Dakota Monday morning, which agrees with the 12Z ECMWF/UKMET/CMC, but the GFS/NAM have trended the focus to a "northern" surface low over southern Saskatchewan. All of the deterministic models show both surface lows, it is just the difference in which one is more dominant. For now, a blended approach is recommended, which is best represented by the 00Z GFS and 12Z ECMWF. ...Shortwave digging from the Aleutians tonight to off the California coast by Monday... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Blend of the 00Z GFS, 12Z ECMWF, 12Z CMC Confidence: Average The differences noted in the guidance relate mostly to timing, with the 00Z NAM on the faster end of the spectrum and the 12Z ECMWF slowest. Given the 00Z GFS is slightly faster than the middle ground, a blend of the 00Z GFS, 12Z ECMWF and 12Z CMC appears to give a timing/strength nearest to the ensemble means. The 12Z UKMET is stronger in the mid-levels and only weakly supported in the ensemble guidance, so it is not preferred given no other deterministic guidance fits its evolution. Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Otto