Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1234 PM EDT Sat Oct 27 2018 Valid Oct 27/1200 UTC thru Oct 31/0000 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 12Z Model Evaluation...with Preferences and Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Blend of 12z GFS/NAM, 00z UKMET/ECMWF (non-CMC blend) Confidence: Slightly above average Through early next week, the synoptic pattern across the CONUS is expected to shift from deep troughing over the eastern US toward the central Plains / Rockies. A couple of shortwave troughs will push through the flow across the northern US. By the middle of next week, surface high pressure transition toward the southeast US while an area of low pressure develops across the lower MS, TN, and OH River Valleys. This will set up an active pattern with several rounds of rainfall. In general, the deterministic model guidance is in good agreement through early next week, replacing the troughing over the eastern US with more zonal flow. Energy from the western US will eventually move toward the Rockies and Central Plains, carving a trough. The NAM/GFS/ECMWF are in reasonable agreement here with the vorticity maxima while the UKMET is similar in placement but stronger in magnitude. With Gulf moisture opening up and advecting toward the mid-MS to lower Great Lakes, the QPF fields are in good agreement. The GFS trended toward the 00z ECMWF, though is still a bit faster. The CMC is considerably faster than the rest, while the UKMET is a decent compromise between the GFS/ECMWF. The NAM's QPF is overall lighter than the rest, but the placement agrees well with the GFS/ECMWF/UKMET. Another area of low pressure will push into the Pacific Northwest Tuesday into Wednesday, bringing a spell of wet weather. Here, the 00z ECMWF was faster than the the rest of the models. So, outside of the Northwest US, a blend of the GFS/UKMET/NAM/ECMWF (basically non-CMC) is preferred. While for the Pacific Northwest, a similar blend can be used but with less weight toward the ECWMF. Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Taylor