Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1145 PM EST Mon Dec 10 2018 Valid Dec 11/0000 UTC thru Dec 14/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z Model Evaluation...with Preferences and Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... Preference: 12z ECMWF/UKMET, 00z GFS Confidence: Average There are two areas of uncertainty in the forecast period across the CONUS. The first lies with the digging wave across the central US that is expected to form a closed low over the southern Plains by Thursday. In the last few model cycles, forecast spread has lessened, increasing confidence somewhat as the models seem to be coming together with respect to earlier spatial and temporal differences. The ECMWF remains the most occluded and thus slowest of the solutions, though the rest of the available guidance in the 00z cycle (GFS, NAM) is not significantly ahead. At least aloft in the 500 mb heights, a general model blend would suffice. At the surface, with the closed low slowing, the surface low occludes further west, now more over the Arklatex region and is also much slower to progress north/northeast. Through the forecast period (84 hrs), the spread is not as large as it was in earlier cycles. Just beyond the period, there are considerable differences in how quickly it kicks out toward the Appalachians and Mid-Atlantic region. The CMC seemed to be too fast pushing the low to the northeast. Overall, a blend of the 12z ECMWF, 00z GFS, 12z UKMET seems appropriate. The other area of forecast uncertainty is back across the Pacific Northwest. By Thursday night into Friday, another strong shortwave trough is expected to push right into Washington state. Here, the models differ considerably on timing, with the 00z GFS/NAM being the fastest and the 12z UKMET is significantly slower (the 12z ECMWF/CMC lie in between). The 12z UKMET also is much stronger and digs the wave deeper across the Pacific, owing to the stronger ridging downstream (likely due to the closed low over the southern Plains). This seems to be an outlier and is not preferred at all. To account for the typical model biases, the preference will be the 12z ECMWF/CMC solutions with some weight given to the slightly faster 00z GFS. Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Taylor