Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 156 PM EST Sun Jan 06 2019 Valid Jan 06/1200 UTC thru Jan 10/0000 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 12Z Model Evaluation...with Preferences and Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... Preference: Non-NAM blend...Eastern U.S. General model blend...Western U.S. Confidence: Slightly above average In general, the model guidance is in good agreement with the large scale pattern across the CONUS through the forecast period. A quick-moving shortwave trough will skirt the Northeast through tonight while a series of shortwave troughs push across the Western U.S. and out across the central Plains which are expected to phase and become a deeper longwave trough over the Eastern U.S. by Wednesday. At the surface, a low will develop across the central Plains and lift into the Great Lakes through Monday, but then a new area of strong cyclogenesis will occur in across the Northeast and coastal areas of New England Tuesday through Wednesday as the aforementioned phasing occurs. The biggest differences noted in the guidance lies with the NAM and the strength of the trough developing across the Great Lakes and into the Northeast Tuesday night into Wednesday. The NAM is north of the model consensus with its height fall evolution over the Northeast, and prior to this, it tends to be a bit deeper than the global models as energy traverses southern Canada. Its surface low depictions across southern Canada and also with the strong cyclogenesis over the Northeast are on the northern end of the model spread. The global models as led by the GFS, UKMET, CMC and ECMWF are in very good agreement with the height fall evolution ejecting east across the Midwest, southern Canada and the Northeast along with their respective surface low plots including the deep low center near New England by Wednesday. The UKMET though is now noted as being a tad weaker than the model consensus with the deep low evolution near New England on Wednesday, but is not the outlier solution like the NAM is depicting. Overall, there is better ensemble support for the non-NAM global model consensus. Elsewhere, the models all agree in having a rather formidable, but transient large scale ridge over the Western U.S. by Tuesday which then breaks down as a deep closed low and associated longwave trough evolves offshore of the West Coast and ejects northeast in across the West Coast and especially the Pacific Northwest. All of the models show a rather strong surface low center as well with these strong height falls. The guidance is in fairly good agreement through Tuesday with their mass field solutions, but thereafter there is some timing spread as the CMC begins to lag the model consensus with the height fall and surface wave evolution. The latest GEFS and ECENS suites support a general model blend led by the deterministic GFS and ECMWF solutions. Thus, based on the comparisons above, a non-NAM blend will be favored across the Eastern U.S., with a general model blend across the Western U.S., which includes the evolution of the deep low center off the West Coast, although a bit more weighting to the GFS/ECMWF camp can be afforded. Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Orrison