Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1224 AM EDT Wed Jun 05 2019 Valid Jun 05/0000 UTC thru Jun 08/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z Model Evaluation with Confidence and Preference ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Blend of the 00Z GFS, 12Z ECMWF Confidence: Slightly above average The model preference remains consistent with the preference over the past couple model cycles -- a blend of the GFS and ECMWF. Despite some slight run-to-run variability and minor trends, the GFS and ECMWF have generally been consistent over the past several model cycles. They also have fairly strong ensemble support. There are important differences from the other deterministic models with the low over the southern U.S. and with a trough moving through the Northwest. First, with the low evolving over the southern Plains, the 12Z CMC tends to eject the low much faster than the other deterministic models, and this does not have much ensemble support. Therefore, the CMC was generally excluded from the model preference. The 00Z NAM produces a reasonable forecast with this system and is in line with the ECMWF and GFS. It could be included in a blend in this region. Meanwhile, the 12Z UKMET trended slower with the low, and it parks the mid-upper level low in the Arklatex region into the weekend. This is plausible, especially with a ridge building over the top of the low through the Great Lakes. However, it doesn't have much ensemble support, so for now it is excluded from the preference. Second, with the trough moving through the Northwest the 00Z NAM is much faster than the other deterministic models and most ensemble members. Therefore, the NAM is excluded from the model preference for this region. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Lamers