Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1201 PM EDT Tue Jun 11 2019 Valid Jun 11/1200 UTC thru Jun 15/0000 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 12Z Model Evaluation...with Confidence and Preferences ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Great Lakes and Northeast US... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Non-GFS, Non-UKMET blend Confidence: Average Troughing over the Great Lakes and Northeast US is expected to amplify/deepen later this week as another shortwave digs into the lower Great Lakes. Through about the first 36 hours or so /13.00z/, model agreement is in good shape and above average with the mass fields. However as the trough axis takes on a negative tilt Friday, more significant differences are seen in the latest deterministic guidance. The 00z UKMET is deeper and more amplified than the rest of the guidance and also a touch slower. Likewise, the 00z CMC is slow edge of the model spread. The NAM, GFS, and ECMWF appear to be in decent shape but 14.00z, the GFS becomes much deeper with the upper level low over the Great Lakes and while the rest of the models phase with another closed low over James Bay, the GFS prefers the two systems to stay distinct. This keeps the GFS on the slower side as the other models push the initial PV anomaly through New England. Overall, confidence drops off considerably by Friday into the weekend. At the surface, the differences are not as significant, but the track of a coastal low will have considerable QPF placement issues along the East Coast later this week. Based on all of this, the consensus seems to be for a non-GFS, non-UKMET blend. ...Western and Southern US... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: General model blend Confidence: Slightly above average Elsewhere across the CONUS (western and southern US), model agreement is slightly above average with better confidence in the mass fields. Mid to upper level ridging along the western US coast will gradually break down as a mid-level wave comes onshore. As this wave treks across in the southern stream flow, the ECMWF is on the weaker side of the model spread and also a touch on the slower end as well. But overall, the guidance shows fairly good agreement and a general model blend is preferred. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Taylor