Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 326 AM EDT Mon Jul 22 2019 Valid Jul 22/0000 UTC thru Jul 25/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z Final Model Evaluation, Including Preference and Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Much of the CONUS... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: General Model Blend Confidence: Above Average 07Z Update: Some subtle differences exist with respect to placement and intensity of shortwaves moving through the amplifying longwave trough across the east. However, the non-NCEP models remained in very good continuity with their previous runs, so no changes are needed in the preferred blend. Previous Discussion: The overall model envelope is minimal even by day 3 with both the temporal and spatial evolution of a cold front swinging across the east, dropping an impressive longwave trough with it. The GFS may be a bit on the fast edge and is quicker than its ensemble mean, while the NAM lags the consensus a bit with its timing. However, even these are acceptable differences at synoptic scales, and see nothing of significant to rule out any of the global suite at this time. ...Desert SW... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Non-NAM Blend Confidence: Slightly Above Average 07Z Update: Although some intensity differences exist with the strength of the ridge by Wednesday, notably the UKMET and ECMWF holding onto higher heights for a longer duration, the overall spread of the ridge setup and position is minimal. The exception continues to be with the NAM handling of shortwave energy rotating into the ridge to enhance monsoonal moisture. Previous Discussion: With a ridge developing across the desert SW which will funnel some monsoonal moisture northward through the period, the NAM is very robust with a shortwave breaking down into the center of the ridge and then rotating westward beneath it days 1-2. This is not echoed by any other guidance, and produces QPF that is much greater across NM/AZ than the remaining suite. The ridge is strong, and it seems unlikely a shortwave of this intensity could break it down so robustly as shown by the NAM. Do expect some higher QPF in the southwest this period, and this is reflected in the remaining guidance, but the NAM should be used with caution across this area. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Weiss