Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 105 PM EDT Sun Jul 28 2019 Valid Jul 28/1200 UTC thru Aug 01/0000 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 12Z Model Evaluation including the NAM/GFS and preliminary preferences ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Central and Eastern U.S... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: General model blend Confidence: Slightly above average Models continue to show generally good consensus for all systems across the CONUS during the short range period, and the 12Z NAM and GFS solutions were in line with this consensus. With respect to shortwave energy crossing the Upper Midwest/Great Lakes tonight into Mon, models showed only minor timing/amplitude differences. A deepening surface low associated with this system is expected to move from south central Minnesota this evening to Lake Superior and into Ontario by Monday. Model solutions were all very well-clustered with respect to the track and timing of this surface low. Solutions agree that this upper-level energy should eventually close off into an upper low in the vicinity of James Bay by Tue. A lingering area of upper-level energy across the Southeast should eventually merge with additional energy from the northern stream system, with all guidance showing an elongated upper trough extending from the Great Lakes to the Southeast by Tue-Wed. Models also handle these features similarly with only minor differences. Farther west, models vary with respect to the intensity of the upper ridge expected to remain anchored across the Four Corners region, but a compromise or middle of the road approach is preferred here. Given the overall good consensus, a general model blend is recommended at this time. ...Pacific Northwest... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Non-NAM blend Confidence: Above average An upper-level low is forecast by all guidance to dive southward off the coast of British Columbia Mon-Wed. Solutions show some variability on the timing and amplitude of this feature, with the NAM being the one solution seeming to stray a bit from consensus, bringing the upper low a bit farther east toward British Columbia, and bringing lower heights a bit farther inland by Thu. Thus, will recommend a non-NAM blend for this system. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Ryan