Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 235 AM EDT Thu Aug 15 2019 Valid Aug 15/0000 UTC thru Aug 18/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z Model Evaluation...with Preferences and Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: 00Z GEFS/12Z ECENS mean blend...North-Central U.S. Non-NAM blend...Remainder of CONUS Confidence: Average The upper-level pattern starts off with strong ridging across the Southwest and northwesterly flow to its north, leading to broad troughing across the eastern half of the nation. The ridge becomes suppressed on Friday and into the weekend as upper-level troughing begins to impinge upon the Northwest, leading to broad quasi-zonal flow from the Pacific Northwest to the Northeast. Anomalous moisture will remain in place ahead of a slow moving front which will extend from the Mid-Atlantic region to the Gulf Coast, while impulses in northwest flow aloft keep the central Plains to the Midwest active with organized convection. There is broad agreement among the global models with the synoptic scale features across these two areas, but the 00Z NAM in general appears to be too amplified and therefore too wet with the energy it has digging down across the Midwest and into the Eastern U.S. through the period. Across the Southeast and eastern Gulf Coast region, the guidance continues to hint at a weak area of low pressure developing along the aforementioned front. The 12Z ECMWF in particular was a strong outlier with this feature as it appeared to be suffering from convective gridscale feedback. The 00Z ECMWF has trended away from this solution and now appears to be much more reasonable and in agreement with the remaining guidance. The guidance is reflecting some of its biggest disagreements with the troughing/closed low energy advancing through south-central Canada this weekend which impacts the evolution of a cold front across the northern Plains and upper Midwest. The 00Z NAM is notably farther north with its track of the closed low, and is farther north with its surface low feature as a result. The NAM leans on the slower side of the guidance with its frontal evolution, but the 00Z CMC/UKMET and 00Z ECMWF are all also now collectively slower. Meanwhile, the 00Z GFS is the fastest solution with its height falls and the surface front. The 00Z GEFS mean and 12Z ECENS mean both suggest the GFS is a fast outlier, but they are a tad faster than the non-NCEP model consensus. Therefore, a preference toward a blend of the ensemble means will again be preferred as they are clustered fairly well with each other. Elsewhere, the models actually show reasonably good model mass field agreement by the end of the period with respect to strong height falls dropping down across western Canada, although the 00Z NAM is likely a tad too strong with its closed low feature. Based on the current guidance, a non-NAM blend will be preferred across the CONUS, with exception to the north-central U.S. where a blend of the 00Z GEFS mean and 12Z ECENS mean will be preferred. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Orrison