Model Diagnostic Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 104 AM EDT Thu Oct 03 2019 Valid Oct 03/0000 UTC thru Oct 06/1200 UTC ...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air ingest... 00Z Preliminary Model Evaluation with Preferences and Forecast Confidence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...Overall Pattern Across the CONUS... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Preference: Non-CMC. Heavy weight on ECENS/GEFS day 3. Confidence: Slightly above average Through 48 hours, the guidance is in very good agreement with a ridge in the east slowly breaking down while a trough digs into the west and ejects quickly into the Northern Plains while taking on a negative tilt. The exception to this is the 12Z/2 CMC which is vastly different, and is likely in response to much different northern/subtropical jet energy phasing across the middle of the country. This interaction is leading to much different amplitudes of the trough-ridge across the CONUS and is well out of tolerance with the remaining suite and consensus. More significant spread develops after 60 hours with the negatively tilting shortwave lifting into the Great Lakes as well as secondary vorticity energy /shortwave/ digging to reinforce the trough across the PacNW D3. The ECMWF is quite amplified with the lead shortwave compared to the remaining guidance, and while the amplitude spread is not significant, the op ECMWF is much deeper than the ECENS mean or any other model so should be used carefully in the Northern Plains/Great Lakes. For the trailing shortwave, spread becomes more robust as the GFS/NAM are sharper and faster, while the ECMWF/UKMET are flatter and a bit slower. The issues with the ECMWF in the lead shortwave cause some concern using the latter shortwave, so a trend towards the ECENS/GEFS mean is most reasonable at the end of the forecast period. Model trends at www.wpc.noaa.gov/html/model2.html 500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml Weiss