Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo - Click to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service   NWS logo - Click to go to the NWS homepage
The Weather Prediction Center

 
 

 

Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Facebook Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Twitter
NCEP Quarterly Newsletter
WPC Home
Analyses and Forecasts
   National High & Low
   WPC Discussions
   Surface Analysis
   Days ½-2½ CONUS
   Days 3-7 CONUS
   Days 4-8 Alaska
   QPF
   PQPF
   Flood Outlook
   Winter Weather
   Storm Summaries
   Heat Index
   Tropical Products
   Daily Weather Map
   GIS Products
Current Watches/
Warnings

Satellite and Radar Imagery
  GOES-East Satellite
  GOES-West Satellite
  National Radar
Product Archive
WPC Verification
   QPF
   Medium Range
   Model Diagnostics
   Event Reviews
   Winter Weather
International Desks
Development and Training
   Development
WPC Overview
   About the WPC
   Staff
   WPC History
   Other Sites
   FAQs
Meteorological Calculators
Contact Us
   About Our Site
 
USA.gov is the U.S. Government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services.
 
Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF) Discussion
 
(Caution: Version displayed is not the latest version. - Issued 0734Z Jun 05, 2018)
 
Version Selection
Versions back from latest:  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   
 
Abbreviations and acronyms used in this product
 
Geographic Boundaries -  Map 1: Color  Black/White       Map 2: Color  Black/White


Quantitative Precipitation Forecast Discussion
NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD
334 AM EDT Tue Jun 05 2018


Prelim Day 1 QPF Discussion
Valid Jun 05/1200 UTC thru Jun 06/1200 UTC
Reference AWIPS Graphics under...Precip Accum - 24hr


...Northern Plains - Upper MS Valley...

Upper ridge axis pushes east of the northern Plains and Upper MS
Valley region Tue night. In its wake, an uptick in broad scale
upper forcing (divergence aloft) will ensue, and get a
considerable boost within the right entrance region of an upper
level jet streak traversing southern Ontario. Meanwhile, the
increasing (and veering) nocturnal LLJ will lead to rapid
low-level moisture/theta e transport ahead of a sharpening frontal
zone. Both synoptic and thermodynamic indicators give credence to
the the multi-model signal of a developing MCS overnight along the
"ring of fire", though as is typical, the model solutions are not
well clustered with respect to the details in terms of MCS track
and thus axis of heaviest rainfall. WPC did nudge the QPF axis a
little father south from the previous forecast -- essentially in
line with the blend of the WRF-ARW, ARW2, and NSSL-WRF (all of
which aligned reasonably well, while the NAM CONUS Nest, WRF-NMMB,
NBM, and global guidance were farther north. Despite the fairly
vigorous mid-level cap, based on climo like the aforementioned
high-res depiction of the heavy rainfall footprint farther south,
along and north of the surface boundary where the coupling of
robust deep-layer elevated instability and moisture transport will
be maximized north-northeast of the 700 mb +12C isotherm. Also
supporting a more southern solution of the MCS track/heaviest QPF
would be the degree of southward propagation overnight, as the
s=sw LLJ begins to exceed the speed of the mean 850-300 mb flow.
At this point, the progged shear profiles would support a
progressive MCS; however, multiple rounds of convection as noted
from the ARW/ARW2 (first one along the initial wnw-ese warm
frontal boundary) could pose a more enhanced flash flood risk
across far northeast SD and southeast ND.

Hurley